A
hybrid cultivar, by definition, is the F1 offspring of a planned cross between
inbred lines, cultivars, clones, or populations. Depending on the breeding
approach,
the
hybrid may comprise two or more parents. A critical requirement of hybrid
production isthat the parents are not identical. As will be discussed next, it
is this divergence that gives hybrids their superior performance. The
outstanding yields of certain modern crops, notably corn, owe their success to
the exploitation of the phenomenon of heterosis, which is high when parents are
divergent. Much of what we know about hybrid breeding came from the discoveries
and experiences of scientists engaged in corn hybrid cultivar development.
However, commercial hybrids are now available for many crops, including
self-pollinating species.
Brief
historical perspective
One
of the earliest records on hybridization dates back to 1716 when American
Cotton Mather observed the effects of cross fertilization in maize, attributing
the multicolored kernels to wind-borne inter-mixture of different colored
cultivars. However,it was the German T.G. Koelreuter who conducted the first
systematic studies on plant hybridization in 1766. Even though previous
observations had been
made
to the effect that offspring of crosses tended to exhibit superior performance
over the parents, it was G.H. Shull who, in 1909, first made clear
scientificbased proposals for exploiting heterosis to produce uniform and high
yielding cultivars. Unfortunately, the idea was at that time impractical and
potentially expensive to commercially exploit. In 1918, D.F. Jones proposed a
more practical and cost-effective approach to producing hybrid cultivars by the
method of the double-cross. Double-cross hybrids produced significantly more
economic yield than the single-cross hybrids originally proposed by Shull. Single-cross
hybrid seed was then produced on weak and unproductive inbred parents, whereas
doublecross seed was produced on vigorous and productive single-cross plants. The
corn production industry was transformed by hybrids, starting in the 1930s.
Other notable advances in the breeding of hybrids were made
by researchers, including M.I. Jenkins in 1934 who devised a method to evaluate the effectiveness of parents in a
cross. Through this screening process, breeders were able to select a few lines
that were good combiners for use in a hybrid breeding.
The next significant
impact on hybrid production also came in the area of techniques of crossing. Because
corn is outcrossed and monoecious, it is necessary to emasculate one of the
parents as part of the breeding process. In the early years of corn hybrid
breeding, emasculation was accomplished by the labor-intensive method of mechanical
detasseling. The discovery and application of cytoplasmic male sterility to corn
hybrid programs eliminated the need for emasculation by the late 1960s. Unfortunately,
the success of CMS was derailed when the Texas
cytoplasm, which was discovered in 1938 and was at that time the dominant form
of male sterility used in corn breeding, succumbed to the southern leaf blight
epidemic of 1970 and devastated the corn industry. It should be mentioned that
mechanized detasselers are used by some major seed companies in hybrid seed
production of corn today.
Realizing that the limited number of inbred lines used in
hybrid programs did not embody the complete genetic potential of the source
population, and the need to develop new inbred lines, scientists embarked on
cyclical recombination to generate new
variability and to improve parental lines. Breeders were able to develop
outstanding inbred lines to make single-cross hybrids economical enough to
replace double-cross hybrids by the 1970s. By this time, corn hybrid production
programs had developed a set of standard practices consisting of the following,
as observed by N.W. Simmonds:
_ Maintenance and improvement of source population by open
pollinated methods.
_ Isolation of new inbreds and improvement of old Ones.
_ Successive improvement of single-cross hybrids by parental
improvement.
_ CMS-based seed production.
The application of hybrid methodology in breeding has
socioeconomic implications. The commercial seed industry has rights to its
inventions that generate royalties. More importantly, because heterosis is maximized
in the F1, farmers are generally prohibited from saving seed from the current
season’s crop to plant the next year’s crop. They must purchase seed from the
seed suppliers each season. Unfortunately, poor producers in developing
countries cannot afford annual seed purchase. Consequently, local and
international efforts continue to be
largely devoted to producing propagable improved open-pollinated cultivars for
developing countries.
0 comments:
Post a Comment